Education 5.0: How Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is changing Education in the Era of Communicative Artificial Intelligence (ComAI)?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54943/lree.v6i1.810Keywords:
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), Communicative Artificial Intelligence (ComAI), Postmodern education, Communicative Constructivism (CoCo)Abstract
The research is a review study on the influence of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in the educational field. The concept of Communicative Artificial Intelligence (ComAI) is identified in order to more precisely describe a new educational reality, in which GenAI is not only a tool but becomes an active participant in communication. Methodologically, the article is a scoping review, as it examines academic approaches to GenAI as a social actor; it also puts forward a proposal for a theoretical framework based on Communicative Constructivism (CoCo) for this new field of research: ComAI. The results of the synthesis and analyses made it possible to establish arguments in favor of introducing this new concept, and key questions are suggested for future research in this emerging field. Special attention is paid to the transformation of assessment and reflection practices, as well as to aspects concerning the value of human–GenAI interaction in the educational process. It is concluded that the active and large-scale development of Communicative Artificial Intelligence makes it necessary to identify a new and specific thematic area of research in education.
Downloads
References
Adarkwah, M. (2024). GenAI-Infused adult learning in the digital era: A conceptual framework for higher education. Adult Learning, 36 (3). https://doi.org/10.1177/10451595241271161
Amer, E., & Elboghdadly, T. (2024). The End of the Search Engine Era and the Rise of Generative AI: A Paradigm Shift in Information Retrieval. In 2024 International Mobile, Intelligent, and Ubiquitous Computing Conference (MIUCC), 374-379. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIUCC62295.2024.10783559
Anakok, I., Katz, A., Chew, K., & Matusovich, H. (2024). Paradigm Shift? Preliminary Findings of Engineering Faculty Members’ Mental Models of Assessment in the Era of Generative AI. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. https://peer.asee.org/47829.pdf
Aristóteles (1985). Ética nicomáquea/Ética Eudemia. Madrid, Gredos. https://www.academia.edu/39776153/ETICA_NICOMAQUEA
Aslan, S., Durham, L., Alyuz, N., Chierichetti, R., Denman, P., Okur, E., ... & Nachman, L. (2024). What is the impact of a multi‐modal pedagogical conversational AI system on parents' concerns about technology use by young children?. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(4), 1625-1650. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13399
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Benítez, M. (2025). Inteligencia Artificial: incidencia en la Educación Superior. Revista Del Cisen Tramas/Maepova, 12(2), 71–90. https://portalderevistas.unsa.edu.ar/index.php/cisen/article/view/4921
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1991). The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Penguin Books. https://amstudugm.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/social-construction-of-reality.pdf
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (2016). The social construction of reality. In Social theory re-wired (pp. 110-122). Routledge.
Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Agarwal, S., Herbert-Voss, A. Krueger, G., Henighan, T., … & Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 1877-1901. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.14165
Carballo, O. (2025). Educación Superior en la Era de la Inteligencia Artificial: Entre la Innovación y la Ética. Educación Superior, (39), 7-8. https://doi.org/10.56918/es.2025.i39.pp7-8
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
Duah, J., & McGivern, P. (2024). How generative artificial intelligence has blurred notions of authorial identity and academic norms in higher education, necessitating clear university usage policies. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 41(2), 180-193. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-11-2023-0213
Flecha, R., Gómez, J., & Puigvert, L. (2001). Contemporary sociological theory. Peter Lang.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum International Publishing Group. https://fsi-ebcao.princeton.edu/sites/g/files/toruqf1411/files/media/freire.pdf
Granić, A. (2025). Emerging Drivers of Adoption of Generative AI Technology in Education: A Review. Applied Sciences, 15(13), 6968. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15136968
Guzman, A., & Lewis, S. (2019). Artificial intelligence and communication: A Human–Machine Communication research agenda. New Media & Society, 22(1), 70-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819858691
Halili, S. (2019). Technological advancements in education 4.0. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 7(1), 63-69. https://www.tojsat.net/journals/tojdel/articles/v07i01/v07i01-08.pdf
Huang, Z., He, Z., & Li, H. (2024). Higher Education Talent Training in The Era of AI: Changes, Challenges and Strategies. In Proceeding of the 2024 8th International Conference on Education and E-Learning, 8-12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3719487.3719502
Knoblauch, H. (2019). The Communicative Construction of Reality (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429431227
Knoblauch, H., & Pfadenhauer, M. (2023). Construction versus realism? The unrealized potential of communicative constructivism. Sociologica, 17(1), 119-136. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/16725
Kumar, U., Kumar, R., Singh, M., Singh, M., Singh, H., Singh, R. y Chabra, R. (2025). Una revisión crítica de la historia de las revoluciones industriales. En Actas de la Conferencia AIP (Vol. 3185, N.º 1, p. 020097). AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0240534
Lehn, D., & Kusenbach, M. (2023). Challenges and Opportunities in the International Reception of" Communicative Constructivism". In Forum: Qualitative Social Research/Qualitative Sozialforschung, 24, (3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.3.4064
Loayza, E. (2024). Una nueva epistemia en la universidad peruana: Revolución mental hacia la universidad 3.0. Educare et Comunicare, 12(1), 83-93. https://doi.org/10.35383/educare.v12i1.1128
Loayza-Maturrano, E. (2025). La inteligencia artificial (IA) en la docencia universitaria: Obstáculos y oportunidades para la innovación educativa. Llimpi, 5(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.54943/lree.v5i1.575
Makhachashvili, R., Semenist, I. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Transdisciplinary Communication Paradigm for Digital Education. In N. Callaos, J. Horne, B. Sánchez, M. Savoie (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th International Multi-Conference on Society, Cybernetics and Informatics: IMSCI 2024, 91-98. International Institute of Informatics and Cybernetics. https://doi.org/10.54808/IMSCI2024.01.91
Nass, C., Steuer, J., & Tauber, E. (1994). Computers are social actors. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 72-78. https://doi.org/10.1145/259963.260288
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001
Lee, C., Wang, M., Chiang, J., Kubota, N., Sato-Shimokawara, E., Nojima, Y., ... & Siow, C. (2024). Quantum computational intelligence with generative AI image for human-machine interaction. In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE) (pp. 1-8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZ-IEEE60900.2024.10611970
Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5, 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
Rafikova, A., Voronin, A. (2025). Human–chatbot communication: a systematic review of psychological studies. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02277-y
Suk, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, J., & Yang, Y. (2025). Communicative AI in the scientific public sphere: An analysis of Twitter discourse on generative AI tools. Telematics and Informatics, 98, 102261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2025.102261
Sysoyev, P. (2024). Ethics and AI-plagiarism in an academic environment: students’ understanding of compliance with author’s ethics and the problem of plagiarism in the process of interaction with generative artificial intelligence. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii= Higher Education in Russia, 33(2), 31-53. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-2-31-53
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://w.pauldowling.me/rtf/2021.1/readings/LSVygotsky_1978_MindinSocietyDevelopmentofHigherPsycholo.pdf
Vygotsky, L. (1995). Pensamiento y lenguaje. Ediciones Fausto. https://abacoenred.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Pensamiento-y-Lenguaje-Vigotsky-Lev.pdf
Published
How to Cite
-
Abstract0
-
PDF (Español (España))0
-
HTML (Español (España))0
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Johan Roy Vivar Robles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors assign their rights to Llimpi so that it may disseminate the article through the means available to it. The authors maintain the right to share, copy, distribute, perform and publicly communicate their article, or part of it, mentioning the original publication in the journal.
ISSN en linea: 2961-2438 
DOI: 10.54943/lree. 
